I’m usually not very timely here in terms of commenting on hot-off-the-press type of events, but I’m going to do it today! Canadian futurist Ruben Nelson shared a piece from the Cascade Institute called “Introduction to Polycrisis Analysis.” I have not reviewed it yet in the appropriate detail it deserves, but my initial reaction is — get this piece immediately!
I’m not sure what it says about me that I got goosebumps of excitement in reading through a paper that explains polycrisis. But do we not need more effective ways of thinking about just this thing? Yes! Right? We are seeing more attention to risks. In fact, the paper does a nice comparison of the various prominent publications covering risks and relates them to the framework they have developed. But it is the frameworks that we are in dire need of. As regular readers know, I’m a sucker for a good framework. And we have one here! Let me pull out a quote that is just beautiful:
At the core of our framework is the stress-trigger-crisis (STC) model, which depicts crises as the product of slow-moving stresses that interact with fast-moving trigger events to push a global system out of its established equilibrium and into a state of disequilibrium (systemic crisis) that causes major human harm.
The paper goes on to explain how to do polycrisis mapping. The explanation is simple and elegant, which suggests to me that they really, really put a lot of time into thinking it through. Such a handy approach — it immediately went into my folder for the next time time I teach World Futures class. And for fans of After Capitalism, this surely aids our understanding of how the baseline is crumbling and how the transformation may unfold.
I didn”t know about the Cascade Institute, but I am a big fan of one of the author’s previous works, Homer-Dixon’s The Upside of Down, which I blogged about way back in 2012. In other words, the authors are not new to this game. It is clear they have been thinking long and hard about what they call the polycrisis. Bravo, well done, and thank you for this wonderful contribution. — Andy Hines
Leave a Reply