Futurists have long lamented the bias of most people to the past (at the expense of the future). This bias seemingly is “hard-wired” into our brains, right? Well, not so fast, perhaps. Every now and then I come across a cluster of seemingly random set of ideas or research, and it bothers me. As you’ve probably anticipated, the cluster relates to people orientation – is it primarily to the future or the past?
- First, in Alt Perspectives class, we recently reviewed Martin Seligman’s paper “Navigating into the Future or Driven by the Past,” which suggests we are more driven by where we are going than where we have been.
- Second, the Anticipation folks suggests that systems are driven by their anticipatory capabilities.
- Third, Sohail Inayatullah’s Futures Triangle acknowledges the weight of the past, but also includes the pull of the future.
- Fourth, we just did our module on Otto Scharmer’s Presencing on sensing the emerging future.
I still agree with the opening point about the bias to the past, but I wonder if we are starting to figure out that it doesn’t necessarily have to be that way, and there is an opportunity to shift that predisposition? I’m not sure – the thoughts are still rattling around in my brain. So, ir seemed like a good idea to share with you readers, and see if you have any thoughts?
Note: See also Philip Zimbardo’s work on time orientation: http://www.thetimeparadox.com/2008/08/03/an-overview-of-time-perspective-types/ — Andy Hines
Leave a Reply