A frequently asked question I get as an educator is “can I get a job as a futurist? I tackled this important and relevant question previously. I’d like to suggest a different question, or perhaps a different approach, here. I’ll answer that question here with a question: “well, what do want to do, or accomplish?” Thus, getting a job (jobbing) versus wanting to do or accomplish (doing).
In foresight, if the answer to “doing” is money, I might point one many other fields. In other words, there are probably lots of easier ways to make money than as a futurist. But I actually encounter very little of this. More often, it’s along the lines of, “I like foresight, but I also need to make a living.” It is a quite reasonable expectation, to want to be able to support oneself and/or one’s my family. My experience, though, is that those who become futurists are to some degree slightly unreasonable people. I mean that in a good way. That is, we are often compelled to follow our vision, even when it’s not the most reasonable thing to do. There are probably easier ways to support oneself and one’s family.
Thus, when a prospective student comes to me with lots of analysis on the potential job market or asks about starting salaries, I’m thinking, “too reasonable.” They probably won’t take the leap, and are likely to be unhappy if they do. That is, they’ll spend a good deal of their educational experience obsessing about their future job – jobbing – instead of search for what they really want to do – doing.
Of course, we get some who are just on fire for foresight and they just have to do it. I would put myself in that camp – I bought at $200 Plymouth Galaxy with no reverse gear, piled in some trash bags full of clothes, and drove south to the Houston program. I know some of you readers are nodding your heads. Probably most of our students are somewhere between this “what are the starting salaries?” (jobbing) and “hair on fire/have to do this” (doing).
“What do you want to accomplish?” is a really, really big question. Probably most prospective students aren’t quite sure what is is they want to do — I sure wasn’t — so, we go on the educational quest in large part to find that out!
In our big study for Lumina on the future of student needs, one of our conclusions was that higher education may be doing a disservice to students in being maniacally focused on job market preparation (jobbing). The alignment to the job market makes is again quite reasonable today, perhaps moreso in the recent past. Our findings suggest it will be less reasonable in the future. If we believe our findings about the future of student needs, it is more about finding purpose. The real challenge will be to find out what you want to do, and then look for the ways to do it. It will be less and less about “jobs” in the classic full-time sense and more about the work we want to accomplish. Perhaps, as has been said in other contexts, the future will be more aligned to the unreasonable, and thus more friendly to futurists. Andy Hines
Seongjin Byun says
Hello, Professor Hines. I agree with you. A futurist as a job at present may not be so attractive, because many other jobs with higher salaries can be alternatives. However, a futurist will be a god job in the fast coming future, becasue we encounter much more uncertainties than ever. For example, in a finanicial market, the mega trend is a transition to passive fund manegement from active fund managemnt. This is a result of increased uncertainties and decreased arbitrage opportunities due to advanced IT, I believe. Recently analyst or fund manager are thinking over much more about economic future, politi al future and competition future. So I think the value of futurist will rise, and futurist with various jobs will be needed more and more.
Andy Hines says
I agree! Even though it may seem self-serving, futurists skills and approaches actually do well in terms of being fairly resistant to automation –systems, thinking, critical thinking, creativity, forward thinking, etc. are not easily automated (by no means immune, but challenging).
Gary says
Rapid advancements in AI and robotics appear poised to really extend this “job” versus “accomplish” question to many (most?) other areas. The “futurist” profession appropriately led the way.
Also appropriate was that your $200 car only went forward, having no reverse gear.
(By the way, if that car was a Galaxy, it was a Ford.) 🙂